🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."